Research Notes

Intel Cost Cutting is Long Overdue, but Alone Can’t Spark a Turnaround

Research Finder

Find by Keyword

Intel Cost Cutting is Long Overdue, but Alone Can’t Spark a Turnaround

Intel’s Q2 2025 results show progress in efficiency, but revenue challenges and restructuring costs endure.

By the Numbers:

  • Revenue: $12.9 billion, slightly above guidance of $12.2-$12.7 billion.
  • GAAP EPS: $(0.67), impacted by $1.9 billion in restructuring charges.
  • Non-GAAP EPS: $(0.10), beating analyst expectations of $(0.14)
  • Q3 2025 Revenue Forecast: $12.6-$13.6 billion, above analyst estimates of $12.65 billion.
  • Cash from Operations: $2.1 billion generated in Q2 2025.

Key Highlights:

  • Intel workforce reductions of ~15%, with a goal of a leaner 75,000 employees by end-2025.
  • Non-GAAP operating expense target remains $17 billion for 2025, $16 billion for 2026.
  • Gross capital expenditures set at $18 billion for 2025, down from $20 billion.
  • Intel 18A process is on track to ramp in H2 2025, supporting Panther Lake launch.
  • Mobileye sale added $922 million to Intel’s balance sheet in July 2025.

The News

Intel reported its Q2 2025 financial results, posting revenue of $12.9 billion, slightly above guidance, but a net loss of $2.9 billion due to significant restructuring charges. New CEO Lip-Bu Tan emphasized progress in operational efficiency and a focus on strengthening Intel’s AI and foundry roadmap. The company forecasted Q3 revenue between $12.6-$13.6 billion, signaling cautious optimism. Learn More

Analyst Take

Intel’s Q2 2025 earnings show a company undergoing a fundamental transition, grappling with structural challenges and a widely acknowledged management-heavy culture while laying the groundwork for a potential recovery. CEO Tan himself acknowledges that, as currently constituted, Intel may not even be in the top-10 of semiconductor companies today. My analysis suggests Intel’s moves to stabilize its financials are on the right track, but the path ahead is fraught with competitive and execution risks. The exact areas where Intel has underperformed in recent years. The reported $12.9 billion in revenue, slightly over guidance, reflects modest demand stabilization, yet the $2.9 billion net loss (driven by $1.9 billion in restructuring charges and $800 million in impairment costs) underscores the heavy costs of Intel’s transformation efforts. These charges (excluded from non-GAAP results) highlight the company’s aggressive cost-reduction measures, including shedding 15% of workforce with a target of approximately 75,000 employees by year-end. This leaner structure aims to deliver a more agile organization, but the entrenched bureaucracy created by layer upon layer of managers over the years will not be so easy to eliminate.

What Was Announced:

Intel’s Q2 2025 results center on operational streamlining and strategic realignment. The company is on track to meet its $17 billion non-GAAP operating expense target for 2025, with a further reduction to $16 billion planned for 2026. Gross capital expenditures were revised downward to $18 billion for 2025, reflecting a focus on capital efficiency. Intel 18A, a critical process node, is set to ramp in the second half of 2025, supporting the launch of Panther Lake, Intel’s first client product on this node. Additionally, Intel sold 57.5 million Mobileye Class A shares in July 2025, raising $922 million to bolster its balance sheet while retaining majority ownership. The integration of the Network and Edge Group (NEX) into Intel’s Client Computing Group (CCG) and Data Center and AI Group (DCAI) reflects a streamlined organizational structure designed to enhance focus on core products and AI capabilities.

Intel’s long overdue pivot under CEO Lip-Bu Tan is clear: organizational efficiency, a strong and concise product portfolio, and a foundry business built for long-term competitiveness. However, the $800 million impairment charge for excess tools is a proof point for the challenges in optimizing manufacturing assets. The company’s AI roadmap, focused on AI PCs and data center offerings, seems to be gaining traction. Yet, competitive pressure from NVIDIA and AMD in AI and high-performance computing have only intensified in the last 12 months. Also, Intel’s foundry ambitions face scrutiny given the company’s historical struggles with process node transitions.

My perspective of the current market is that Intel’s streamlining costs are a necessary response to years of underperformance, but cutting alone can’t restore market leadership. The foundry business, while promising, requires flawless execution to compete with TSMC and Samsung. Intel’s $7.86 billion in CHIPS Act funding, with $2.2 billion already received, provides a financial cushion but also ties the company to ambitious domestic manufacturing goals. The Mobileye share sale, while providing a needed short-term boost to liquidity, is likely a one-time thing; otherwise, Intel will be prioritizing short-term financial health over long-term bets on autonomous driving. 

The semiconductor market is at a crossroads. AI continues to spur historic demand, but economic and AI business model uncertainties will moderate that growth. Intel’s ability to capitalize on AI PC momentum and deliver on Intel 18A will be critical. The company, however, is obviously in the early stages of a multi-year turnaround based on restructuring charges and ongoing losses. The question will be, was trimming the bloated management structure enough, and will the remaining staff be able to reduce their processes to align with the new org chart?

Looking Ahead

Based on my analysis of the market, Intel’s Q2 2025 results mark a tentative step toward recovery, but the company’s success hinges on execution in its foundry and AI strategies. The key trend I’ll be tracking is Intel’s ability to secure external foundry customers for Intel 18A, as this will validate its pivot to a foundry model. Going forward, I’ll be looking for how Intel balances cost-cutting with R&D investment to avoid stifling innovation. When you look at the market as a whole, today’s announcement underscores the challenges of competing in a capital-intensive industry dominated by specialized players. HyperFRAME will closely monitor Intel’s progress in delivering Panther Lake and improving gross margins in future quarters, as these will be critical indicators of whether Intel can reclaim its position as a semiconductor leader - or at least a place back in the top-10.

Author Information

Stephen Sopko | Analyst-in-Residence – Semiconductors & Deep Tech

Stephen Sopko is an Analyst-in-Residence specializing in semiconductors and the deep technologies powering today’s innovation ecosystem. With decades of executive experience spanning Fortune 100, government, and startups, he provides actionable insights by connecting market trends and cutting-edge technologies to business outcomes.

Stephen’s expertise in analyzing the entire buyer’s journey, from technology acquisition to implementation, was refined during his tenure as co-founder and COO of Palisade Compliance, where he helped Fortune 500 clients optimize technology investments. His ability to identify opportunities at the intersection of semiconductors, emerging technologies, and enterprise needs makes him a sought-after advisor to stakeholders navigating complex decisions.