Infinite Logo Carousel
Infinite Logo Carousel

HyperFRAME Lens Research

State of the
Enterprise AI Stack

1H 2026

Primary Research · January 2026

Research Overview

The HyperFRAME Research Lens: State of the Enterprise AI Stack is primary research examining how enterprises design, deploy, and operate AI infrastructure, data platforms, and control planes at scale. It's based on a survey of 544 enterprise IT and data leaders across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The study benchmarks AI Stack maturity across strategy, model adoption, architecture readiness, governance, and operational integration. Published on a twice-yearly, non-paywalled basis, the Lens provides a data-driven reference point for understanding how enterprises are moving from AI experimentation to industrialized execution.

Key Highlights

  • 78%

    of organizations agree AI is strategically important, yet only 37% utilize a structured process for evaluation and deployment — revealing a significant strategy-to-execution gap.

  • 14%

    of enterprises classify their core data architecture as "fully modernized" for AI workloads today, with 23% still on a legacy on-premises data warehouse.

  • 72%

    of respondents treat AI as a near-term performance lever for operational efficiency rather than a primary innovation driver.

  • 53%

    identify security hacks as a critical concern, but only 40% have institutionalized a dedicated AI governance committee.

  • 23%

    of AI/ML projects launched in the last year were successful in reaching production and meeting original ROI objectives — the Execution Gap.

  • 79%

    anticipate having multiple foundation models concurrently deployed, signaling multi-model architecture as the emerging enterprise standard.

Artificial intelligence is no longer an experimental layer sitting at the edge of technology; it is becoming embedded across core business systems and decision-making processes. As organizations move from pilots to production, success is increasingly determined by the structure and maturity of the AI Stack — a layered operating model spanning strategy, data foundations, governance, and infrastructure.

However, strategic intent is currently undermined by a lack of operational readiness. This report provides an empirical view into how organizations are navigating this transition, prioritizing investments, and addressing the technical constraints that continue to limit scale.

This 1H 2026 HyperFRAME Research Lens on the State of the Enterprise AI Stack provides a comprehensive analysis of the enterprise AI landscape, including:

  • Strategy & Business Value: The dominance of evidence-based adoption and the shift from the initial AI rush toward disciplined investment.
  • Model Strategy & LLM Adoption: Detailed breakdown of proprietary vs. open-source vs. hybrid model mixes.
  • Data Platform Ecosystems: The prevalence of legacy on-premises bottlenecks and the trajectory of cloud-native modernization.
  • Governance & Trust: How IT departments are leading AI oversight and the prioritization of access controls and data sanitization.
  • Operationalizing AI: Current maturity levels for MLOps, AIOps, and LLMOps and the projected shift toward industrialized, automated deployment.
  • Adoption Friction: Analysis of the primary blockers, including poor data quality, talent shortages, and technical infrastructure gaps.

Study Profile

To ensure findings reflect real-world constraints rather than vendor-led narratives, this study reflects perspectives across a diverse mix of industries and regions:

  • Total Respondents544 qualified enterprise leaders
  • Organizational ProfileEntities with 500 or more employees
  • Geographic MixEurope (40%), North America (39%), Asia-Pacific (21%)
  • Key Stakeholder Roles30% Decision Leads, 23% Technical Sponsors, 20% Strategic Owners
  • Primary IndustriesSoftware/Cloud/AI, Banking & Financial Services, Technology & Hardware

Figure 2: Current Stage of AI Implementation vs. Estimated Future Maturity

Figure 5: Enterprise LLM Selection Approach: Open-Source vs. Proprietary Adoption Mix

Donut chart: LLM selection approach
  • Proprietary/commercial LLMs only (e.g., OpenAI, Google, Anthropic)
  • Primarily open-source but some proprietary LLMs
  • Open-source LLMs only (e.g., LLaMA, Falcon)
  • Primarily proprietary but some open-source LLMs
  • An even balance of open-source and proprietary LLMs
  • We haven't made that decision yet

Figure 17: Current and Projected Infrastructure Providers for AI Workloads

Current 12–24 months from now
Amazon Web Services – AWS
54%
57%
Microsoft Azure
44%
43%
Google Cloud – GCP
33%
35%
IBM Cloud
24%
24%
Dell
20%
16%
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
15%
20%
Lenovo
12%
23%
Alibaba
12%
18%
Cisco
11%
16%
HPE
10%
5%
Tencent
8%
8%
Neo Cloud (CoreWeave, Vultr, OVHCloud)
2%
4%
SuperMicro
2%
2%

HyperFRAME Research Lens: AI Stack 1H 2026 Raw Data

Welcome to the data-first view of the State of the Enterprise AI Stack. This section is designed for architects, researchers, and strategic planners who require the raw empirical evidence behind our analysis. Below are the foundational metrics covering organizational maturity, architectural readiness, and infrastructure preferences.

If you'd like to discuss this data further, please contact us.

Is your organization currently implementing or planning any AI initiatives (e.g., evaluations, pilots, development, deployments) within the next 12 months?

  • Yes
    100%
  • No
    0%

Which of the following best describes your involvement and responsibilities across your organization's overall approach to AI?

  • Decision Lead
    29.6%
  • Technical Sponsor
    23.2%
  • Strategic Owner
    20.4%
  • Contributor / Implementer
    17.3%
  • Observer / Researcher
    9.6%

Please indicate if you have a significant level of involvement in making or influencing decisions with specific elements of the AI Stack. (multi-select)

  • Data and Integration
    70.2%
  • AI Observability & Governance
    59.2%
  • AI Business Applications
    57.7%
  • Model Development & Training
    54.4%
  • App Development & Middleware
    51.7%
  • Model Hosting & Orchestration
    46.5%

Which of the following best describes the industry which your organization serves?

  • Software, Cloud & AI
    10.3%
  • Technology & Hardware
    10.3%
  • Banking & Financial Services
    10.1%
  • Retail & Consumer Goods
    9.2%
  • Manufacturing & Basic Materials
    8.5%
  • Professional & Consumer Services
    8.3%
  • Construction & Real Estate
    7.9%
  • Telecom, Data Centers & Infra
    7.0%
  • Energy & Utilities
    6.4%
  • Healthcare Services
    6.2%
  • Life Sciences & MedTech
    5.3%
  • Agriculture
    4.2%
  • Mining & Minerals
    3.9%
  • Other
    2.4%

In which country are you personally located?

  • United States
    13.6%
  • United Kingdom
    10.5%
  • Canada
    8.3%
  • Mexico
    7.2%
  • France
    4.6%
  • Germany
    4.6%
  • Brazil
    3.7%
  • Argentina
    3.1%
  • Nordics
    2.9%
  • India
    2.6%
  • China
    2.6%
  • Colombia
    2.6%
  • Spain
    3.9%
  • Italy
    4.2%
  • Japan
    2.4%
  • Australia
    2.0%
  • Indonesia
    2.0%
  • UAE
    2.2%
  • Singapore
    2.2%
  • Hong Kong
    1.8%
  • Poland
    1.8%
  • Russia
    1.8%
  • Malaysia
    1.7%
  • Israel
    1.7%
  • Saudi Arabia
    1.5%
  • South Korea
    1.3%
  • Taiwan
    1.3%
  • Macau
    0.7%
  • Panama
    0.9%
  • New Zealand
    0.4%

Please estimate the total number of employees across your entire company or organization (worldwide).

  • 2 to 999
    19.5%
  • 1,000 to 2,499
    19.5%
  • 2,500 to 4,999
    17.6%
  • 5,000 to 9,999
    15.1%
  • 10,000 to 19,999
    10.7%
  • 20,000 to 49,999
    9.4%
  • 50,000 or more
    8.3%

Which of the following best describes your department or functional role?

  • Information Technology (IT)
    29.4%
  • Operations
    15.1%
  • Information Security (IS)
    10.7%
  • Executive Leadership
    8.1%
  • Customer Service / Support
    7.0%
  • Finance & Accounting
    7.0%
  • R&D / Product Development
    6.8%
  • Marketing
    6.6%
  • Human Resources
    4.4%
  • Sales
    3.1%
  • Legal and Compliance
    1.8%

Which title best describes your leadership responsibilities within your organization?

  • Director, Manager, or Team Lead
    25.2%
  • Mid Leadership
    20.2%
  • Senior Management
    17.5%
  • Project Manager
    12.7%
  • C-level Executive
    12.5%
  • Practitioner / Specialist
    6.8%
  • Consultant / Advisor
    5.1%

Which of the following best describes your primary technical responsibilities within your organization?

  • Overall AI Stack Oversight
    19.9%
  • Oversight of AI-enabling IT
    10.1%
  • Data Scientist
    9.2%
  • Data Engineer
    9.2%
  • Director of Cloud/Hybrid Cloud
    8.1%
  • Oversight of AI-enabling Infra
    8.1%
  • ML Engineer
    7.5%
  • Senior Systems/Platform Engineer
    7.4%
  • Enterprise Architect
    7.0%
  • Data Architect
    6.2%
  • Security/SecOps Engineer
    4.8%
  • Site Reliability Engineer (SRE)
    2.6%

Which of the following best describes your organization's overall approach to adopting new technologies?

  • Mass Market Adopter
    32.5%
  • Late Adopter
    19.5%
  • Early Adopter
    21.5%
  • Innovator
    17.3%
  • Laggard
    9.2%

AI Implementation Stage — Currently

  • Experimenting
    29.4%
  • Developing
    24.3%
  • Initial Deployments
    15.4%
  • Mass Deployments
    15.1%
  • Planning
    8.5%
  • Learning
    7.4%

AI Implementation Stage — Within 6 months

  • Mass Deployments
    31.4%
  • Initial Deployments
    32.7%
  • Developing
    19.7%
  • Experimenting
    9.7%
  • Planning
    5.1%
  • Learning
    0.9%

AI Implementation Stage — Within 6–12 months

  • Mass Deployments
    55.3%
  • Initial Deployments
    23.0%
  • Developing
    12.9%
  • Experimenting
    6.1%
  • Planning
    2.0%
  • Learning
    0.4%

AI Implementation Stage — Within 12–24 months

  • Mass Deployments
    66.4%
  • Initial Deployments
    14.5%
  • Developing
    11.0%
  • Not Sure
    5.0%
  • Experimenting
    2.4%
  • Planning
    0.4%
  • Learning
    0.4%

Improved operational efficiency and process automation. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Primary (within 12 months)
    71.9%
  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    24.6%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    3.5%

Enhanced decision-making through advanced analytics and insights. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    53.1%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    39.3%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    7.5%

Accelerated innovation and new product/service development. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    47.8%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    41.7%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    10.5%

Enhanced customer engagement and personalization. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Primary (within 12 months)
    55.3%
  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    41.2%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    3.5%

Reduced costs and improve margin performance. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Primary (within 12 months)
    46.5%
  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    39.0%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    14.5%

Improved employee productivity, acquisition or retention through AI tools/copilots. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Primary (within 12 months)
    55.7%
  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    30.5%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    13.8%

Strengthened risk management, governance, and compliance. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    48.0%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    42.1%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    9.9%

Development of new AI-enabled business models or revenue streams. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    42.5%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    29.0%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    28.5%

Improved competitive advantage. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    46.3%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    39.5%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    14.2%

Established market awareness as a leading AI-enabled business. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    54.8%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    28.7%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    16.5%

Other (please specify) — Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.

  • Secondary (12–24 months)
    52.4%
  • Primary (within 12 months)
    38.1%
  • Tertiary (not a focus)
    9.5%

Most Important Primary Objective

Of the Primary objectives or outcomes you've selected, which do you consider the most important to achieve?

  • Operational Efficiency & Automation
    23.9%
  • Innovation & New Products
    12.5%
  • Cost Reduction & Margin
    12.0%
  • Advanced Analytics
    11.4%
  • Employee Productivity
    11.4%
  • New AI Business Models
    9.0%
  • Customer Engagement
    8.1%
  • Risk Management & Governance
    6.3%
  • Competitive Advantage
    3.3%
  • Market Awareness
    2.0%

Which of the following thresholds must be met to greenlight an AI project? (multi-select)

  • Clear operational or cost efficiency
    63.2%
  • Expected ROI of 15–20% or higher
    44.1%
  • Strategic alignment / innovation potential
    43.2%
  • Payback period < 12 months
    25.6%

Most Important Threshold

Of the items you've selected, which do you consider the most important or primary to achieve?

  • Clear operational or cost efficiency
    45.8%
  • Expected ROI of 15–20% or higher
    28.3%
  • Strategic alignment / innovation potential
    15.4%
  • Payback period < 12 months
    10.5%

Do you have a dedicated AI governance committee or cross-functional team responsible for AI strategy and oversight?

  • Yes
    40.4%
  • Plan to — within 6 months
    29.2%
  • Plan to — within 6–12 months
    21.5%
  • No plans yet
    8.8%

Primary Leader of AI Committee

Which organization is currently (or will be) the primary leader or driver of your AI committee or team?

  • Information Technology (IT)
    40.7%
  • Executive Leadership
    21.8%
  • Operations
    7.1%
  • Human Resources
    6.0%
  • Customer Service / Support
    5.0%
  • R&D / Product Development
    5.4%
  • Marketing
    3.4%
  • Information Security (IS)
    3.2%
  • Finance & Accounting
    4.6%
  • Sales
    1.2%
  • Legal and Compliance
    1.4%

Which is your organization's primary approach to selecting/using LLMs?

  • Proprietary/commercial LLMs only
    30.9%
  • Primarily open-source, some proprietary
    20.8%
  • Open-source LLMs only
    17.3%
  • Primarily proprietary, some open-source
    15.4%
  • Even balance of both
    11.8%
  • Not decided yet
    3.9%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Customer service/support (chatbots, virtual assistants, helpdesk automation)?

  • Currently in use
    50.4%
  • Within 6 months
    23.2%
  • Within 6–12 months
    13.6%
  • Within 12–24 months
    8.3%
  • No Plans
    4.6%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Knowledge management/research (market research, internal documentation, insights generation)?

  • Within 6 months
    40.3%
  • Currently in use
    35.7%
  • Within 6–12 months
    14.2%
  • Within 12–24 months
    5.5%
  • No Plans
    4.4%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Code generation/software development support (DevOps, automation, code assistants)?

  • Within 6 months
    35.5%
  • Currently in use
    28.7%
  • Within 6–12 months
    22.1%
  • Within 12–24 months
    10.7%
  • No Plans
    3.1%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support IT management and operations (IT helpdesk, operations management, data or device security)?

  • Currently in use
    43.8%
  • Within 6 months
    31.1%
  • Within 6–12 months
    17.8%
  • Within 12–24 months
    4.4%
  • No Plans
    2.9%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Financial operations (accounting systems, fraud detection)?

  • Within 6 months
    39.5%
  • Currently in use
    26.5%
  • Within 6–12 months
    21.5%
  • Within 12–24 months
    9.6%
  • No Plans
    2.9%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Content creation/marketing automation?

  • Currently in use
    41.0%
  • Within 6 months
    30.0%
  • Within 6–12 months
    17.6%
  • Within 12–24 months
    5.3%
  • No Plans
    6.1%

What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support other business functions (specify)?

  • Currently in use
    36.4%
  • No Plans
    27.3%
  • Within 6 months
    13.6%
  • Within 6–12 months
    13.6%
  • Within 12–24 months
    9.1%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Customer Service.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    22.1%
  • Rank 2
    20.0%
  • Rank 3
    18.0%
  • Rank 4
    13.1%
  • Rank 5
    13.6%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    13.2%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Internal Operations.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    25.9%
  • Rank 2
    14.3%
  • Rank 3
    20.8%
  • Rank 4
    18.4%
  • Rank 5
    13.1%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    7.5%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Product Development.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    21.7%
  • Rank 2
    20.6%
  • Rank 3
    17.8%
  • Rank 4
    17.6%
  • Rank 5
    13.8%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    8.5%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Risk/Compliance.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    13.8%
  • Rank 2
    18.4%
  • Rank 3
    17.6%
  • Rank 4
    18.8%
  • Rank 5
    16.4%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    15.1%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: R&D/Innovation.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    10.7%
  • Rank 2
    16.0%
  • Rank 3
    13.4%
  • Rank 4
    16.0%
  • Rank 5
    26.5%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    17.5%

Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Marketing/Sales Support.

  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    38.2%
  • Rank 5
    16.7%
  • Rank 4
    16.2%
  • Rank 3
    12.3%
  • Rank 2
    10.7%
  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    5.9%

How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? User Data Privacy.

  • Significantly Concerned
    44.1%
  • Somewhat Concerned
    41.4%
  • Not Concerned At All
    14.5%

How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? Corporate Data Privacy.

  • Significantly Concerned
    47.1%
  • Somewhat Concerned
    38.4%
  • Not Concerned At All
    14.5%

How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? Security, Hacks.

  • Significantly Concerned
    53.1%
  • Somewhat Concerned
    32.4%
  • Not Concerned At All
    14.5%

How much is your organization concerned about Hallucinations / Inaccurate Outputs from AI and LLMs?

  • Somewhat Concerned
    47.1%
  • Significantly Concerned
    33.3%
  • Not Concerned At All
    19.7%

How much is your organization concerned about Bias in LLM Data?

  • Somewhat Concerned
    44.1%
  • Significantly Concerned
    37.9%
  • Not Concerned At All
    18.0%

How much is your organization concerned about Reliability / Accuracy of Corporate Data in AI systems?

  • Significantly Concerned
    48.0%
  • Somewhat Concerned
    35.3%
  • Not Concerned At All
    16.7%

How much is your organization concerned about the Cost to Deploy or Maintain AI systems?

  • Somewhat Concerned
    42.6%
  • Significantly Concerned
    40.1%
  • Not Concerned At All
    17.3%

How much is your organization concerned about Misuse of AI by Employees?

  • Significantly Concerned
    42.8%
  • Somewhat Concerned
    36.2%
  • Not Concerned At All
    21.0%

How much is your organization concerned about Lack of Employee Training / Engagement with AI?

  • Somewhat Concerned
    46.3%
  • Significantly Concerned
    39.5%
  • Not Concerned At All
    14.2%

Which of the concerns you've selected is the most important or primary concern that needs to be addressed?

  • Security, Hacks
    32.5%
  • Reliability / Accuracy of Corporate Data
    15.0%
  • Corporate Data Privacy
    12.8%
  • User Data Privacy
    11.8%
  • Cost to Deploy or Maintain
    9.2%
  • Hallucinations / Inaccurate Outputs
    5.3%
  • Bias in LLM Data
    5.1%
  • Lack of Employee Training
    4.3%
  • Misuse by Employees
    3.9%

Our organization is actively evaluating new foundation models at least once per quarter.

  • Agree
    41.7%
  • Strongly Agree
    31.1%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    15.3%
  • Disagree
    7.4%
  • Strongly Disagree
    4.6%

We anticipate having multiple foundation models concurrently deployed.

  • Strongly Agree
    39.2%
  • Agree
    26.7%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    19.5%
  • Disagree
    9.0%
  • Strongly Disagree
    5.7%

We anticipate adding additional or replacing existing models every year.

  • Strongly Agree
    39.0%
  • Agree
    28.9%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    19.3%
  • Strongly Disagree
    7.5%
  • Disagree
    5.3%

The ability to add or replace foundation models will provide our business with agility and improve our competitive posture.

  • Agree
    33.6%
  • Strongly Agree
    30.7%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    22.6%
  • Disagree
    10.5%
  • Strongly Disagree
    2.6%

AI is strategically important to our organization's overall success.

  • Strongly Agree
    46.3%
  • Agree
    32.4%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    9.7%
  • Disagree
    7.7%
  • Strongly Disagree
    3.9%

Deploying AI and leveraging LLMs will be critical to maintaining our competitive advantage over the coming 1–3 years.

  • Agree
    42.5%
  • Strongly Agree
    30.0%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    14.7%
  • Disagree
    7.7%
  • Strongly Disagree
    5.1%

Agentic AI (autonomous workflows/agents) will play a significant role in our AI strategy over the coming 12 months.

  • Strongly Agree
    41.7%
  • Agree
    37.5%
  • Neutral / Unsure
    9.0%
  • Disagree
    9.0%
  • Strongly Disagree
    2.8%

What steps are you prioritizing to ensure the security of sensitive data when interacting with or fine-tuning LLMs? (multi-select)

  • Strict access controls, encryption, pen testing
    63.2%
  • Data anonymization / de-identification
    58.3%
  • Network, API security
    55.3%
  • On-premises or private cloud deployment
    45.8%
  • Data cleansing / minimization before training
    43.9%
  • Synthetic / generated datasets for fine-tuning
    33.5%

What best describes the current state of your core data architecture (warehouse, lake, or lakehouse)?

  • Hybrid setup
    36.6%
  • Cloud-based data lake or lakehouse
    26.1%
  • Legacy on-premises data warehouse
    23.0%
  • Fully modernized AI-ready architecture
    14.3%

What is the status of modernizing your organization's data architecture?

  • In process now
    36.2%
  • Complete
    20.6%
  • Planning within 6 months
    20.0%
  • Planning within 6–12 months
    12.7%
  • Waiting 1 year or more
    8.5%
  • No plans to modernize
    2.0%

How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Need for better scalability, performance, and real-time access.

  • Very Important
    66.0%
  • Somewhat Important
    30.8%
  • Not Important
    3.2%

How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Integration and governance of siloed or fragmented data.

  • Very Important
    65.3%
  • Somewhat Important
    32.3%
  • Not Important
    2.4%

How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Reduction of infrastructure costs and technical debt.

  • Somewhat Important
    49.9%
  • Very Important
    45.0%
  • Not Important
    5.1%

How important is Compliance, security, and data sovereignty requirements as a driver for modernizing your data architecture?

  • Very Important
    69.6%
  • Somewhat Important
    26.5%
  • Not Important
    3.9%

Which of the drivers you've selected is the most important or primary driver for modernizing your data architecture?

  • Integration & governance of siloed data
    29.5%
  • Scalability, performance & real-time access
    27.6%
  • Compliance, security & data sovereignty
    23.6%
  • Reduction of infrastructure costs & technical debt
    19.3%

To what extent is your data platform designed or ready to support AI/ML workloads?

  • Barely (less than 50%)
    28.0%
  • Mostly (75% there)
    26.2%
  • Completely (100%)
    24.0%
  • Somewhat (50% there)
    21.8%

Which strategy best describes how your enterprise is primarily adopting Artificial Intelligence?

  • Customize or Adapt AI
    38.9%
  • Buy AI (Embedded in software)
    31.9%
  • Build AI (Proprietary)
    16.4%
  • Explore AI (Evaluating)
    12.8%

Which of the following are (or were) primary barriers to updating your data architecture for AI/ML? (multi-select)

  • Scalability / performance
    49.4%
  • Skills / talent shortages
    40.6%
  • Budget limitations or cost uncertainty
    39.3%
  • Security / privacy / regulatory
    35.8%
  • Operationalization / MLOps readiness
    31.6%
  • Data quality / governance
    30.5%
  • Resource allocation conflicts
    15.1%

Top Most Significant Barrier

  • Scalability / performance
    22.6%
  • Budget limitations or cost uncertainty
    20.8%
  • Skills / talent shortages
    19.9%
  • Data quality / governance
    15.6%
  • Operationalization / MLOps readiness
    11.2%
  • Security / privacy / regulatory
    6.6%
  • Resource allocation conflicts
    3.3%

How important are automated data validation and cleansing pipelines in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?

  • Very Important
    61.0%
  • Somewhat Important
    34.9%
  • Not Important
    4.0%

How important is a centralized data catalog and governance tools in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?

  • Very Important
    61.9%
  • Somewhat Important
    34.4%
  • Not Important
    3.7%

How important are feature stores or curated datasets in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?

  • Very Important
    51.7%
  • Somewhat Important
    43.6%
  • Not Important
    4.8%

How important is monitoring and auditing for model input/output in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?

  • Very Important
    64.0%
  • Somewhat Important
    32.0%
  • Not Important
    4.0%

How important are other factors (please specify) in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?

  • Very Important
    0.2%
  • Somewhat Important
    0.2%
  • Not Important
    0%

How well integrated is your data platform with AI/ML operationalization (MLOps/LLMOps) workflows?

  • Partially integrated (<50%)
    32.4%
  • Mostly integrated (50%+)
    31.6%
  • Fully integrated (end-to-end)
    21.1%
  • Not integrated (silos)
    14.9%

Infrastructure Providers — Today (multi-select)

  • Amazon Web Services – AWS
    53.7%
  • Microsoft Azure
    44.1%
  • Google Cloud – GCP
    32.7%
  • IBM Cloud
    24.1%
  • Dell
    19.9%
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
    15.4%
  • Alibaba
    12.1%
  • Lenovo
    12.1%
  • Cisco
    10.8%
  • HPE
    9.7%
  • Tencent
    8.1%
  • Neo Cloud (CoreWeave, Vultr, OVHCloud)
    2.4%
  • SuperMicro
    1.8%

Infrastructure Providers — 12–24 Months from Now (multi-select)

  • Amazon Web Services – AWS
    57.0%
  • Microsoft Azure
    43.0%
  • Google Cloud – GCP
    34.7%
  • IBM Cloud
    23.9%
  • Lenovo
    22.6%
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
    19.7%
  • Alibaba
    18.0%
  • Dell
    16.0%
  • Cisco
    16.0%
  • Tencent
    8.1%
  • HPE
    5.3%
  • Neo Cloud (CoreWeave, Vultr, OVHCloud)
    4.2%
  • SuperMicro
    1.7%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Performance.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    35.3%
  • Rank 2
    24.4%
  • Rank 3
    18.4%
  • Rank 4
    11.8%
  • Rank 5
    6.2%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    3.9%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Cost.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    24.8%
  • Rank 2
    15.1%
  • Rank 3
    17.6%
  • Rank 4
    16.4%
  • Rank 5
    11.6%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    14.5%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Ecosystem Compatibility.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    13.1%
  • Rank 2
    11.9%
  • Rank 3
    14.9%
  • Rank 4
    21.5%
  • Rank 5
    20.8%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    17.8%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Security.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    21.3%
  • Rank 2
    31.4%
  • Rank 3
    23.2%
  • Rank 4
    11.8%
  • Rank 5
    7.7%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    4.6%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Governance.

  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    3.3%
  • Rank 2
    9.7%
  • Rank 3
    14.7%
  • Rank 4
    20.4%
  • Rank 5
    30.7%
  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    21.1%

Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Support/Training.

  • Rank 6 (Least Important)
    38.1%
  • Rank 5
    23.0%
  • Rank 4
    18.2%
  • Rank 3
    11.2%
  • Rank 2
    7.4%
  • Rank 1 (Most Important)
    2.2%

What percent of all distinct AI/ML projects (pilots, proofs-of-concept, and deployments) launched at your organization in the past 12 months are at the following stages?

  • Stalled / In Process
    25.7%
  • Pending / Planning
    16.9%
  • Successful (deployed, meeting ROI)
    22.8%
  • Partially Successful (deployed, not meeting ROI)
    20.7%
  • Failed / Abandoned
    13.8%

How significant is Data Integration and Curation as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    57.4%
  • Somewhat Significant
    33.5%
  • Not Significant
    9.2%

How significant is Infrastructure as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    60.7%
  • Somewhat Significant
    33.8%
  • Not Significant
    5.5%

How significant is Security as a technical challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    62.5%
  • Somewhat Significant
    29.6%
  • Not Significant
    7.9%

How significant is Tool Complexity as a technical challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Somewhat Significant
    53.5%
  • Very Significant
    36.0%
  • Not Significant
    10.5%

How significant is Executive Buy-In as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    48.5%
  • Somewhat Significant
    33.3%
  • Not Significant
    18.2%

How significant is the Talent Gap as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    46.0%
  • Somewhat Significant
    37.9%
  • Not Significant
    16.2%

How significant is Organizational Resistance to Change as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Somewhat Significant
    42.8%
  • Very Significant
    40.3%
  • Not Significant
    16.9%

How significant is Regulatory & Compliance as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?

  • Very Significant
    50.6%
  • Somewhat Significant
    38.6%
  • Not Significant
    10.8%

Which of the above challenges is the top most significant or challenging to overcome?

  • Data Integration & Curation
    23.6%
  • Security
    21.9%
  • Executive Buy-In
    12.9%
  • Tool Complexity
    11.6%
  • Infrastructure
    15.5%
  • Talent Gap
    6.1%
  • Organizational Resistance to Change
    4.4%
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    3.5%

Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Cost.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    23.7%
  • Rank 2
    13.8%
  • Rank 3
    14.3%
  • Rank 4
    12.7%
  • Rank 5
    9.0%
  • Rank 6
    10.1%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    16.4%

Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Data Quality.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    27.0%
  • Rank 2
    19.1%
  • Rank 3
    18.8%
  • Rank 4
    13.2%
  • Rank 5
    8.6%
  • Rank 6
    7.5%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    5.7%

Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Talent Shortage.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    13.4%
  • Rank 2
    11.9%
  • Rank 3
    11.8%
  • Rank 4
    15.1%
  • Rank 5
    20.0%
  • Rank 6
    16.2%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    11.6%

Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Executive Buy-In.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    9.4%
  • Rank 2
    12.7%
  • Rank 3
    10.7%
  • Rank 4
    15.3%
  • Rank 5
    16.0%
  • Rank 6
    20.0%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    16.0%

Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Infrastructure.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    9.9%
  • Rank 2
    21.0%
  • Rank 3
    14.2%
  • Rank 4
    12.7%
  • Rank 5
    20.0%
  • Rank 6
    12.1%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    10.1%

Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Trust/Safety.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    11.9%
  • Rank 2
    15.6%
  • Rank 3
    20.2%
  • Rank 4
    15.1%
  • Rank 5
    11.6%
  • Rank 6
    17.6%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    7.9%

Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Governance/Compliance.

  • Rank 1 (Most Significant)
    4.6%
  • Rank 2
    5.9%
  • Rank 3
    10.1%
  • Rank 4
    16.0%
  • Rank 5
    14.7%
  • Rank 6
    16.4%
  • Rank 7 (Least Significant)
    32.4%

Using a scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest), please rate the maturity of your MLOps, AIOps or LLMOps practices today.

  • 1 (Lowest)
    1.8%
  • 10 (Highest)
    6.8%

Full distribution available in raw data export.

Using a scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest), please estimate where your MLOps, AIOps or LLMOps maturity will be in 12–24 months.

  • 1 (Lowest)
    0%
  • 10 (Highest)
    10.3%

Full distribution available in raw data export.

Does your organization have a skills gap (or lack of expertise) in AI that you consider a barrier to successful AI implementations?

  • Yes
    64.7%
  • No
    35.3%

How important is upskilling existing staff as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?

  • Very Important
    58.5%
  • Somewhat Important
    32.1%
  • Not Important
    9.4%

How important is hiring new personnel as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?

  • Very Important
    49.1%
  • Somewhat Important
    37.5%
  • Not Important
    13.4%

How important is augmenting staff with contractors or consultants as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?

  • Very Important
    54.3%
  • Somewhat Important
    26.4%
  • Not Important
    19.3%

How important is acquiring other companies with existing expertise as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap?

  • Somewhat Important
    42.9%
  • Very Important
    32.4%
  • Not Important
    24.7%

How important is delaying AI initiatives until you have the necessary skills as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap?

  • Somewhat Important
    41.8%
  • Very Important
    26.4%
  • Not Important
    31.8%

What is the primary or most important approach you've selected in dealing with the AI skills gap?

  • Upskilling existing staff
    38.6%
  • Hiring new personnel
    25.3%
  • Contractors or consultants
    16.8%
  • Acquiring companies with expertise
    13.9%
  • Delaying AI initiatives
    5.1%

Does your organization have a clear process for evaluating, testing, and deploying new AI technologies, or is it case by case?

  • Partially structured
    40.1%
  • Structured process in place
    37.1%
  • Case-by-case
    22.8%

On average, how long does it take to move an AI project from development to production?

  • 3–6 months
    43.6%
  • 1–3 months
    24.3%
  • 6–12 months
    18.0%
  • <1 month
    6.4%
  • 12+ months
    5.5%
  • Unsure / haven't made it there
    2.2%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Customer Experience & Engagement over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    53.1%
  • Moderate Transformation
    36.6%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    10.3%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Operations & Process Automation over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    59.4%
  • Moderate Transformation
    31.8%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    8.8%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Product Development & Innovation over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    46.9%
  • Moderate Transformation
    39.3%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    13.8%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Manufacturing & Engineering over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    56.8%
  • Moderate Transformation
    26.3%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    16.9%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Back Office functions (HR, Finance & Legal) over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    54.0%
  • Moderate Transformation
    34.4%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    11.6%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Coding & Development over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    57.2%
  • Moderate Transformation
    34.2%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    8.6%

How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Sales & Marketing over the coming 3–5 years?

  • Significant Transformation
    51.8%
  • Moderate Transformation
    39.2%
  • Limited or No Transformation
    9.0%

When do you plan to implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)?

  • Within 6–12 months
    31.1%
  • Within 6 months
    25.7%
  • Already implemented
    21.9%
  • Unsure / Evaluating
    21.3%

How important are vendor partnerships and ecosystem strength (e.g., cloud providers, specialized AI vendors, integrators) to the success of your AI strategy?

  • Very Important — Critical to AI strategy
    54.2%
  • Somewhat Important — Helpful but not essential
    34.9%
  • Neutral / Moderate — Minor role
    9.2%
  • Not Important
    1.7%

Which of the following best describes your organization's current position or status on Shadow AI?

  • Strictly prohibited with enforcement issues
    37.3%
  • Strictly prohibited and enforced
    22.8%
  • Guided allowance / support
    22.8%
  • Flexible / Experimental
    14.7%
  • Unsure
    2.4%

How important is implementing strict monitoring and access controls in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?

  • Very Important
    64.7%
  • Somewhat Important
    30.3%
  • Not Important
    5.0%

How important is providing training and guidelines for safe AI use in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?

  • Very Important
    66.5%
  • Somewhat Important
    26.1%
  • Not Important
    7.4%

How important is conducting audits or reviews of AI tool usage in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?

  • Very Important
    53.9%
  • Somewhat Important
    37.5%
  • Not Important
    8.6%

How important is accepting some risk as part of an innovation strategy in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?

  • Very Important
    47.6%
  • Somewhat Important
    40.1%
  • Not Important
    12.3%

Primary Approach to Managing Shadow AI Risks

  • Training & guidelines for safe AI use
    52.4%
  • Strict monitoring & access controls
    22.8%
  • Audits or reviews of AI tool usage
    18.8%
  • Accepting some risk for innovation
    6.1%
We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.