HyperFRAME Lens Research
State of the
Enterprise AI Stack
1H 2026
Primary Research · January 2026
01
Research Overview
The HyperFRAME Research Lens: State of the Enterprise AI Stack is primary research examining how enterprises design, deploy, and operate AI infrastructure, data platforms, and control planes at scale. It's based on a survey of 544 enterprise IT and data leaders across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The study benchmarks AI Stack maturity across strategy, model adoption, architecture readiness, governance, and operational integration. Published on a twice-yearly, non-paywalled basis, the Lens provides a data-driven reference point for understanding how enterprises are moving from AI experimentation to industrialized execution.
Key Highlights
-
78%
of organizations agree AI is strategically important, yet only 37% utilize a structured process for evaluation and deployment — revealing a significant strategy-to-execution gap.
-
14%
of enterprises classify their core data architecture as "fully modernized" for AI workloads today, with 23% still on a legacy on-premises data warehouse.
-
72%
of respondents treat AI as a near-term performance lever for operational efficiency rather than a primary innovation driver.
-
53%
identify security hacks as a critical concern, but only 40% have institutionalized a dedicated AI governance committee.
-
23%
of AI/ML projects launched in the last year were successful in reaching production and meeting original ROI objectives — the Execution Gap.
-
79%
anticipate having multiple foundation models concurrently deployed, signaling multi-model architecture as the emerging enterprise standard.
Artificial intelligence is no longer an experimental layer sitting at the edge of technology; it is becoming embedded across core business systems and decision-making processes. As organizations move from pilots to production, success is increasingly determined by the structure and maturity of the AI Stack — a layered operating model spanning strategy, data foundations, governance, and infrastructure.
However, strategic intent is currently undermined by a lack of operational readiness. This report provides an empirical view into how organizations are navigating this transition, prioritizing investments, and addressing the technical constraints that continue to limit scale.
This 1H 2026 HyperFRAME Research Lens on the State of the Enterprise AI Stack provides a comprehensive analysis of the enterprise AI landscape, including:
- Strategy & Business Value: The dominance of evidence-based adoption and the shift from the initial AI rush toward disciplined investment.
- Model Strategy & LLM Adoption: Detailed breakdown of proprietary vs. open-source vs. hybrid model mixes.
- Data Platform Ecosystems: The prevalence of legacy on-premises bottlenecks and the trajectory of cloud-native modernization.
- Governance & Trust: How IT departments are leading AI oversight and the prioritization of access controls and data sanitization.
- Operationalizing AI: Current maturity levels for MLOps, AIOps, and LLMOps and the projected shift toward industrialized, automated deployment.
- Adoption Friction: Analysis of the primary blockers, including poor data quality, talent shortages, and technical infrastructure gaps.
Study Profile
To ensure findings reflect real-world constraints rather than vendor-led narratives, this study reflects perspectives across a diverse mix of industries and regions:
- Total Respondents544 qualified enterprise leaders
- Organizational ProfileEntities with 500 or more employees
- Geographic MixEurope (40%), North America (39%), Asia-Pacific (21%)
- Key Stakeholder Roles30% Decision Leads, 23% Technical Sponsors, 20% Strategic Owners
- Primary IndustriesSoftware/Cloud/AI, Banking & Financial Services, Technology & Hardware
Figure 2: Current Stage of AI Implementation vs. Estimated Future Maturity
Figure 5: Enterprise LLM Selection Approach: Open-Source vs. Proprietary Adoption Mix
- Proprietary/commercial LLMs only (e.g., OpenAI, Google, Anthropic)
- Primarily open-source but some proprietary LLMs
- Open-source LLMs only (e.g., LLaMA, Falcon)
- Primarily proprietary but some open-source LLMs
- An even balance of open-source and proprietary LLMs
- We haven't made that decision yet
Figure 17: Current and Projected Infrastructure Providers for AI Workloads
02
HyperFRAME Research Lens: AI Stack 1H 2026 Raw Data
Welcome to the data-first view of the State of the Enterprise AI Stack. This section is designed for architects, researchers, and strategic planners who require the raw empirical evidence behind our analysis. Below are the foundational metrics covering organizational maturity, architectural readiness, and infrastructure preferences.
If you'd like to discuss this data further, please contact us.
Is your organization currently implementing or planning any AI initiatives (e.g., evaluations, pilots, development, deployments) within the next 12 months?
- Yes100%
- No0%
Which of the following best describes your involvement and responsibilities across your organization's overall approach to AI?
- Decision Lead29.6%
- Technical Sponsor23.2%
- Strategic Owner20.4%
- Contributor / Implementer17.3%
- Observer / Researcher9.6%
Please indicate if you have a significant level of involvement in making or influencing decisions with specific elements of the AI Stack. (multi-select)
- Data and Integration70.2%
- AI Observability & Governance59.2%
- AI Business Applications57.7%
- Model Development & Training54.4%
- App Development & Middleware51.7%
- Model Hosting & Orchestration46.5%
Which of the following best describes the industry which your organization serves?
- Software, Cloud & AI10.3%
- Technology & Hardware10.3%
- Banking & Financial Services10.1%
- Retail & Consumer Goods9.2%
- Manufacturing & Basic Materials8.5%
- Professional & Consumer Services8.3%
- Construction & Real Estate7.9%
- Telecom, Data Centers & Infra7.0%
- Energy & Utilities6.4%
- Healthcare Services6.2%
- Life Sciences & MedTech5.3%
- Agriculture4.2%
- Mining & Minerals3.9%
- Other2.4%
In which country are you personally located?
- United States13.6%
- United Kingdom10.5%
- Canada8.3%
- Mexico7.2%
- France4.6%
- Germany4.6%
- Brazil3.7%
- Argentina3.1%
- Nordics2.9%
- India2.6%
- China2.6%
- Colombia2.6%
- Spain3.9%
- Italy4.2%
- Japan2.4%
- Australia2.0%
- Indonesia2.0%
- UAE2.2%
- Singapore2.2%
- Hong Kong1.8%
- Poland1.8%
- Russia1.8%
- Malaysia1.7%
- Israel1.7%
- Saudi Arabia1.5%
- South Korea1.3%
- Taiwan1.3%
- Macau0.7%
- Panama0.9%
- New Zealand0.4%
Please estimate the total number of employees across your entire company or organization (worldwide).
- 2 to 99919.5%
- 1,000 to 2,49919.5%
- 2,500 to 4,99917.6%
- 5,000 to 9,99915.1%
- 10,000 to 19,99910.7%
- 20,000 to 49,9999.4%
- 50,000 or more8.3%
Which of the following best describes your department or functional role?
- Information Technology (IT)29.4%
- Operations15.1%
- Information Security (IS)10.7%
- Executive Leadership8.1%
- Customer Service / Support7.0%
- Finance & Accounting7.0%
- R&D / Product Development6.8%
- Marketing6.6%
- Human Resources4.4%
- Sales3.1%
- Legal and Compliance1.8%
Which title best describes your leadership responsibilities within your organization?
- Director, Manager, or Team Lead25.2%
- Mid Leadership20.2%
- Senior Management17.5%
- Project Manager12.7%
- C-level Executive12.5%
- Practitioner / Specialist6.8%
- Consultant / Advisor5.1%
Which of the following best describes your primary technical responsibilities within your organization?
- Overall AI Stack Oversight19.9%
- Oversight of AI-enabling IT10.1%
- Data Scientist9.2%
- Data Engineer9.2%
- Director of Cloud/Hybrid Cloud8.1%
- Oversight of AI-enabling Infra8.1%
- ML Engineer7.5%
- Senior Systems/Platform Engineer7.4%
- Enterprise Architect7.0%
- Data Architect6.2%
- Security/SecOps Engineer4.8%
- Site Reliability Engineer (SRE)2.6%
Which of the following best describes your organization's overall approach to adopting new technologies?
- Mass Market Adopter32.5%
- Late Adopter19.5%
- Early Adopter21.5%
- Innovator17.3%
- Laggard9.2%
AI Implementation Stage — Currently
- Experimenting29.4%
- Developing24.3%
- Initial Deployments15.4%
- Mass Deployments15.1%
- Planning8.5%
- Learning7.4%
AI Implementation Stage — Within 6 months
- Mass Deployments31.4%
- Initial Deployments32.7%
- Developing19.7%
- Experimenting9.7%
- Planning5.1%
- Learning0.9%
AI Implementation Stage — Within 6–12 months
- Mass Deployments55.3%
- Initial Deployments23.0%
- Developing12.9%
- Experimenting6.1%
- Planning2.0%
- Learning0.4%
AI Implementation Stage — Within 12–24 months
- Mass Deployments66.4%
- Initial Deployments14.5%
- Developing11.0%
- Not Sure5.0%
- Experimenting2.4%
- Planning0.4%
- Learning0.4%
Improved operational efficiency and process automation. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Primary (within 12 months)71.9%
- Secondary (12–24 months)24.6%
- Tertiary (not a focus)3.5%
Enhanced decision-making through advanced analytics and insights. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)53.1%
- Primary (within 12 months)39.3%
- Tertiary (not a focus)7.5%
Accelerated innovation and new product/service development. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)47.8%
- Primary (within 12 months)41.7%
- Tertiary (not a focus)10.5%
Enhanced customer engagement and personalization. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Primary (within 12 months)55.3%
- Secondary (12–24 months)41.2%
- Tertiary (not a focus)3.5%
Reduced costs and improve margin performance. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Primary (within 12 months)46.5%
- Secondary (12–24 months)39.0%
- Tertiary (not a focus)14.5%
Improved employee productivity, acquisition or retention through AI tools/copilots. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Primary (within 12 months)55.7%
- Secondary (12–24 months)30.5%
- Tertiary (not a focus)13.8%
Strengthened risk management, governance, and compliance. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)48.0%
- Primary (within 12 months)42.1%
- Tertiary (not a focus)9.9%
Development of new AI-enabled business models or revenue streams. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)42.5%
- Primary (within 12 months)29.0%
- Tertiary (not a focus)28.5%
Improved competitive advantage. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)46.3%
- Primary (within 12 months)39.5%
- Tertiary (not a focus)14.2%
Established market awareness as a leading AI-enabled business. Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)54.8%
- Primary (within 12 months)28.7%
- Tertiary (not a focus)16.5%
Other (please specify) — Please identify the priority or importance in achieving the following objectives or outcomes through the adoption of AI.
- Secondary (12–24 months)52.4%
- Primary (within 12 months)38.1%
- Tertiary (not a focus)9.5%
Most Important Primary Objective
Of the Primary objectives or outcomes you've selected, which do you consider the most important to achieve?
- Operational Efficiency & Automation23.9%
- Innovation & New Products12.5%
- Cost Reduction & Margin12.0%
- Advanced Analytics11.4%
- Employee Productivity11.4%
- New AI Business Models9.0%
- Customer Engagement8.1%
- Risk Management & Governance6.3%
- Competitive Advantage3.3%
- Market Awareness2.0%
Which of the following thresholds must be met to greenlight an AI project? (multi-select)
- Clear operational or cost efficiency63.2%
- Expected ROI of 15–20% or higher44.1%
- Strategic alignment / innovation potential43.2%
- Payback period < 12 months25.6%
Most Important Threshold
Of the items you've selected, which do you consider the most important or primary to achieve?
- Clear operational or cost efficiency45.8%
- Expected ROI of 15–20% or higher28.3%
- Strategic alignment / innovation potential15.4%
- Payback period < 12 months10.5%
Do you have a dedicated AI governance committee or cross-functional team responsible for AI strategy and oversight?
- Yes40.4%
- Plan to — within 6 months29.2%
- Plan to — within 6–12 months21.5%
- No plans yet8.8%
Primary Leader of AI Committee
Which organization is currently (or will be) the primary leader or driver of your AI committee or team?
- Information Technology (IT)40.7%
- Executive Leadership21.8%
- Operations7.1%
- Human Resources6.0%
- Customer Service / Support5.0%
- R&D / Product Development5.4%
- Marketing3.4%
- Information Security (IS)3.2%
- Finance & Accounting4.6%
- Sales1.2%
- Legal and Compliance1.4%
Which is your organization's primary approach to selecting/using LLMs?
- Proprietary/commercial LLMs only30.9%
- Primarily open-source, some proprietary20.8%
- Open-source LLMs only17.3%
- Primarily proprietary, some open-source15.4%
- Even balance of both11.8%
- Not decided yet3.9%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Customer service/support (chatbots, virtual assistants, helpdesk automation)?
- Currently in use50.4%
- Within 6 months23.2%
- Within 6–12 months13.6%
- Within 12–24 months8.3%
- No Plans4.6%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Knowledge management/research (market research, internal documentation, insights generation)?
- Within 6 months40.3%
- Currently in use35.7%
- Within 6–12 months14.2%
- Within 12–24 months5.5%
- No Plans4.4%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Code generation/software development support (DevOps, automation, code assistants)?
- Within 6 months35.5%
- Currently in use28.7%
- Within 6–12 months22.1%
- Within 12–24 months10.7%
- No Plans3.1%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support IT management and operations (IT helpdesk, operations management, data or device security)?
- Currently in use43.8%
- Within 6 months31.1%
- Within 6–12 months17.8%
- Within 12–24 months4.4%
- No Plans2.9%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Financial operations (accounting systems, fraud detection)?
- Within 6 months39.5%
- Currently in use26.5%
- Within 6–12 months21.5%
- Within 12–24 months9.6%
- No Plans2.9%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support Content creation/marketing automation?
- Currently in use41.0%
- Within 6 months30.0%
- Within 6–12 months17.6%
- Within 12–24 months5.3%
- No Plans6.1%
What are your plans for using or deploying LLMs to support other business functions (specify)?
- Currently in use36.4%
- No Plans27.3%
- Within 6 months13.6%
- Within 6–12 months13.6%
- Within 12–24 months9.1%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Customer Service.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)22.1%
- Rank 220.0%
- Rank 318.0%
- Rank 413.1%
- Rank 513.6%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)13.2%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Internal Operations.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)25.9%
- Rank 214.3%
- Rank 320.8%
- Rank 418.4%
- Rank 513.1%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)7.5%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Product Development.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)21.7%
- Rank 220.6%
- Rank 317.8%
- Rank 417.6%
- Rank 513.8%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)8.5%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Risk/Compliance.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)13.8%
- Rank 218.4%
- Rank 317.6%
- Rank 418.8%
- Rank 516.4%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)15.1%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: R&D/Innovation.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)10.7%
- Rank 216.0%
- Rank 313.4%
- Rank 416.0%
- Rank 526.5%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)17.5%
Please rank the following AI application areas from most to least important to your organization today: Marketing/Sales Support.
- Rank 6 (Least Important)38.2%
- Rank 516.7%
- Rank 416.2%
- Rank 312.3%
- Rank 210.7%
- Rank 1 (Most Important)5.9%
How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? User Data Privacy.
- Significantly Concerned44.1%
- Somewhat Concerned41.4%
- Not Concerned At All14.5%
How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? Corporate Data Privacy.
- Significantly Concerned47.1%
- Somewhat Concerned38.4%
- Not Concerned At All14.5%
How much is your organization concerned about the following aspects of AI and LLMs? Security, Hacks.
- Significantly Concerned53.1%
- Somewhat Concerned32.4%
- Not Concerned At All14.5%
How much is your organization concerned about Hallucinations / Inaccurate Outputs from AI and LLMs?
- Somewhat Concerned47.1%
- Significantly Concerned33.3%
- Not Concerned At All19.7%
How much is your organization concerned about Bias in LLM Data?
- Somewhat Concerned44.1%
- Significantly Concerned37.9%
- Not Concerned At All18.0%
How much is your organization concerned about Reliability / Accuracy of Corporate Data in AI systems?
- Significantly Concerned48.0%
- Somewhat Concerned35.3%
- Not Concerned At All16.7%
How much is your organization concerned about the Cost to Deploy or Maintain AI systems?
- Somewhat Concerned42.6%
- Significantly Concerned40.1%
- Not Concerned At All17.3%
How much is your organization concerned about Misuse of AI by Employees?
- Significantly Concerned42.8%
- Somewhat Concerned36.2%
- Not Concerned At All21.0%
How much is your organization concerned about Lack of Employee Training / Engagement with AI?
- Somewhat Concerned46.3%
- Significantly Concerned39.5%
- Not Concerned At All14.2%
Which of the concerns you've selected is the most important or primary concern that needs to be addressed?
- Security, Hacks32.5%
- Reliability / Accuracy of Corporate Data15.0%
- Corporate Data Privacy12.8%
- User Data Privacy11.8%
- Cost to Deploy or Maintain9.2%
- Hallucinations / Inaccurate Outputs5.3%
- Bias in LLM Data5.1%
- Lack of Employee Training4.3%
- Misuse by Employees3.9%
Our organization is actively evaluating new foundation models at least once per quarter.
- Agree41.7%
- Strongly Agree31.1%
- Neutral / Unsure15.3%
- Disagree7.4%
- Strongly Disagree4.6%
We anticipate having multiple foundation models concurrently deployed.
- Strongly Agree39.2%
- Agree26.7%
- Neutral / Unsure19.5%
- Disagree9.0%
- Strongly Disagree5.7%
We anticipate adding additional or replacing existing models every year.
- Strongly Agree39.0%
- Agree28.9%
- Neutral / Unsure19.3%
- Strongly Disagree7.5%
- Disagree5.3%
The ability to add or replace foundation models will provide our business with agility and improve our competitive posture.
- Agree33.6%
- Strongly Agree30.7%
- Neutral / Unsure22.6%
- Disagree10.5%
- Strongly Disagree2.6%
AI is strategically important to our organization's overall success.
- Strongly Agree46.3%
- Agree32.4%
- Neutral / Unsure9.7%
- Disagree7.7%
- Strongly Disagree3.9%
Deploying AI and leveraging LLMs will be critical to maintaining our competitive advantage over the coming 1–3 years.
- Agree42.5%
- Strongly Agree30.0%
- Neutral / Unsure14.7%
- Disagree7.7%
- Strongly Disagree5.1%
Agentic AI (autonomous workflows/agents) will play a significant role in our AI strategy over the coming 12 months.
- Strongly Agree41.7%
- Agree37.5%
- Neutral / Unsure9.0%
- Disagree9.0%
- Strongly Disagree2.8%
What steps are you prioritizing to ensure the security of sensitive data when interacting with or fine-tuning LLMs? (multi-select)
- Strict access controls, encryption, pen testing63.2%
- Data anonymization / de-identification58.3%
- Network, API security55.3%
- On-premises or private cloud deployment45.8%
- Data cleansing / minimization before training43.9%
- Synthetic / generated datasets for fine-tuning33.5%
What best describes the current state of your core data architecture (warehouse, lake, or lakehouse)?
- Hybrid setup36.6%
- Cloud-based data lake or lakehouse26.1%
- Legacy on-premises data warehouse23.0%
- Fully modernized AI-ready architecture14.3%
What is the status of modernizing your organization's data architecture?
- In process now36.2%
- Complete20.6%
- Planning within 6 months20.0%
- Planning within 6–12 months12.7%
- Waiting 1 year or more8.5%
- No plans to modernize2.0%
How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Need for better scalability, performance, and real-time access.
- Very Important66.0%
- Somewhat Important30.8%
- Not Important3.2%
How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Integration and governance of siloed or fragmented data.
- Very Important65.3%
- Somewhat Important32.3%
- Not Important2.4%
How important is the following as a driver for modernizing your data architecture? Reduction of infrastructure costs and technical debt.
- Somewhat Important49.9%
- Very Important45.0%
- Not Important5.1%
How important is Compliance, security, and data sovereignty requirements as a driver for modernizing your data architecture?
- Very Important69.6%
- Somewhat Important26.5%
- Not Important3.9%
Which of the drivers you've selected is the most important or primary driver for modernizing your data architecture?
- Integration & governance of siloed data29.5%
- Scalability, performance & real-time access27.6%
- Compliance, security & data sovereignty23.6%
- Reduction of infrastructure costs & technical debt19.3%
To what extent is your data platform designed or ready to support AI/ML workloads?
- Barely (less than 50%)28.0%
- Mostly (75% there)26.2%
- Completely (100%)24.0%
- Somewhat (50% there)21.8%
Which strategy best describes how your enterprise is primarily adopting Artificial Intelligence?
- Customize or Adapt AI38.9%
- Buy AI (Embedded in software)31.9%
- Build AI (Proprietary)16.4%
- Explore AI (Evaluating)12.8%
Which of the following are (or were) primary barriers to updating your data architecture for AI/ML? (multi-select)
- Scalability / performance49.4%
- Skills / talent shortages40.6%
- Budget limitations or cost uncertainty39.3%
- Security / privacy / regulatory35.8%
- Operationalization / MLOps readiness31.6%
- Data quality / governance30.5%
- Resource allocation conflicts15.1%
Top Most Significant Barrier
- Scalability / performance22.6%
- Budget limitations or cost uncertainty20.8%
- Skills / talent shortages19.9%
- Data quality / governance15.6%
- Operationalization / MLOps readiness11.2%
- Security / privacy / regulatory6.6%
- Resource allocation conflicts3.3%
How important are automated data validation and cleansing pipelines in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?
- Very Important61.0%
- Somewhat Important34.9%
- Not Important4.0%
How important is a centralized data catalog and governance tools in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?
- Very Important61.9%
- Somewhat Important34.4%
- Not Important3.7%
How important are feature stores or curated datasets in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?
- Very Important51.7%
- Somewhat Important43.6%
- Not Important4.8%
How important is monitoring and auditing for model input/output in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?
- Very Important64.0%
- Somewhat Important32.0%
- Not Important4.0%
How important are other factors (please specify) in managing and ensuring data quality, governance, and lineage for AI models?
- Very Important0.2%
- Somewhat Important0.2%
- Not Important0%
How well integrated is your data platform with AI/ML operationalization (MLOps/LLMOps) workflows?
- Partially integrated (<50%)32.4%
- Mostly integrated (50%+)31.6%
- Fully integrated (end-to-end)21.1%
- Not integrated (silos)14.9%
Infrastructure Providers — Today (multi-select)
- Amazon Web Services – AWS53.7%
- Microsoft Azure44.1%
- Google Cloud – GCP32.7%
- IBM Cloud24.1%
- Dell19.9%
- Oracle Cloud Infrastructure15.4%
- Alibaba12.1%
- Lenovo12.1%
- Cisco10.8%
- HPE9.7%
- Tencent8.1%
- Neo Cloud (CoreWeave, Vultr, OVHCloud)2.4%
- SuperMicro1.8%
Infrastructure Providers — 12–24 Months from Now (multi-select)
- Amazon Web Services – AWS57.0%
- Microsoft Azure43.0%
- Google Cloud – GCP34.7%
- IBM Cloud23.9%
- Lenovo22.6%
- Oracle Cloud Infrastructure19.7%
- Alibaba18.0%
- Dell16.0%
- Cisco16.0%
- Tencent8.1%
- HPE5.3%
- Neo Cloud (CoreWeave, Vultr, OVHCloud)4.2%
- SuperMicro1.7%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Performance.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)35.3%
- Rank 224.4%
- Rank 318.4%
- Rank 411.8%
- Rank 56.2%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)3.9%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Cost.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)24.8%
- Rank 215.1%
- Rank 317.6%
- Rank 416.4%
- Rank 511.6%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)14.5%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Ecosystem Compatibility.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)13.1%
- Rank 211.9%
- Rank 314.9%
- Rank 421.5%
- Rank 520.8%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)17.8%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Security.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)21.3%
- Rank 231.4%
- Rank 323.2%
- Rank 411.8%
- Rank 57.7%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)4.6%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Governance.
- Rank 1 (Most Important)3.3%
- Rank 29.7%
- Rank 314.7%
- Rank 420.4%
- Rank 530.7%
- Rank 6 (Least Important)21.1%
Please rank the following criteria from most to least important when selecting infrastructure/model vendors: Support/Training.
- Rank 6 (Least Important)38.1%
- Rank 523.0%
- Rank 418.2%
- Rank 311.2%
- Rank 27.4%
- Rank 1 (Most Important)2.2%
What percent of all distinct AI/ML projects (pilots, proofs-of-concept, and deployments) launched at your organization in the past 12 months are at the following stages?
- Stalled / In Process25.7%
- Pending / Planning16.9%
- Successful (deployed, meeting ROI)22.8%
- Partially Successful (deployed, not meeting ROI)20.7%
- Failed / Abandoned13.8%
How significant is Data Integration and Curation as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant57.4%
- Somewhat Significant33.5%
- Not Significant9.2%
How significant is Infrastructure as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant60.7%
- Somewhat Significant33.8%
- Not Significant5.5%
How significant is Security as a technical challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant62.5%
- Somewhat Significant29.6%
- Not Significant7.9%
How significant is Tool Complexity as a technical challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Somewhat Significant53.5%
- Very Significant36.0%
- Not Significant10.5%
How significant is Executive Buy-In as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant48.5%
- Somewhat Significant33.3%
- Not Significant18.2%
How significant is the Talent Gap as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant46.0%
- Somewhat Significant37.9%
- Not Significant16.2%
How significant is Organizational Resistance to Change as a challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Somewhat Significant42.8%
- Very Significant40.3%
- Not Significant16.9%
How significant is Regulatory & Compliance as an organizational challenge in adopting/scaling your AI Stack?
- Very Significant50.6%
- Somewhat Significant38.6%
- Not Significant10.8%
Which of the above challenges is the top most significant or challenging to overcome?
- Data Integration & Curation23.6%
- Security21.9%
- Executive Buy-In12.9%
- Tool Complexity11.6%
- Infrastructure15.5%
- Talent Gap6.1%
- Organizational Resistance to Change4.4%
- Regulatory & Compliance3.5%
Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Cost.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)23.7%
- Rank 213.8%
- Rank 314.3%
- Rank 412.7%
- Rank 59.0%
- Rank 610.1%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)16.4%
Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Data Quality.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)27.0%
- Rank 219.1%
- Rank 318.8%
- Rank 413.2%
- Rank 58.6%
- Rank 67.5%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)5.7%
Please rank the following barriers or inhibitors to broad-scale AI adoption today, from most to least significant: Talent Shortage.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)13.4%
- Rank 211.9%
- Rank 311.8%
- Rank 415.1%
- Rank 520.0%
- Rank 616.2%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)11.6%
Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Executive Buy-In.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)9.4%
- Rank 212.7%
- Rank 310.7%
- Rank 415.3%
- Rank 516.0%
- Rank 620.0%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)16.0%
Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Infrastructure.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)9.9%
- Rank 221.0%
- Rank 314.2%
- Rank 412.7%
- Rank 520.0%
- Rank 612.1%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)10.1%
Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Trust/Safety.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)11.9%
- Rank 215.6%
- Rank 320.2%
- Rank 415.1%
- Rank 511.6%
- Rank 617.6%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)7.9%
Please rank the following barriers to broad-scale AI adoption from most to least significant: Governance/Compliance.
- Rank 1 (Most Significant)4.6%
- Rank 25.9%
- Rank 310.1%
- Rank 416.0%
- Rank 514.7%
- Rank 616.4%
- Rank 7 (Least Significant)32.4%
Using a scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest), please rate the maturity of your MLOps, AIOps or LLMOps practices today.
- 1 (Lowest)1.8%
- 10 (Highest)6.8%
Full distribution available in raw data export.
Using a scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest), please estimate where your MLOps, AIOps or LLMOps maturity will be in 12–24 months.
- 1 (Lowest)0%
- 10 (Highest)10.3%
Full distribution available in raw data export.
Does your organization have a skills gap (or lack of expertise) in AI that you consider a barrier to successful AI implementations?
- Yes64.7%
- No35.3%
How important is upskilling existing staff as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?
- Very Important58.5%
- Somewhat Important32.1%
- Not Important9.4%
How important is hiring new personnel as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?
- Very Important49.1%
- Somewhat Important37.5%
- Not Important13.4%
How important is augmenting staff with contractors or consultants as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap within your organization?
- Very Important54.3%
- Somewhat Important26.4%
- Not Important19.3%
How important is acquiring other companies with existing expertise as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap?
- Somewhat Important42.9%
- Very Important32.4%
- Not Important24.7%
How important is delaying AI initiatives until you have the necessary skills as an approach to addressing the AI skills gap?
- Somewhat Important41.8%
- Very Important26.4%
- Not Important31.8%
What is the primary or most important approach you've selected in dealing with the AI skills gap?
- Upskilling existing staff38.6%
- Hiring new personnel25.3%
- Contractors or consultants16.8%
- Acquiring companies with expertise13.9%
- Delaying AI initiatives5.1%
Does your organization have a clear process for evaluating, testing, and deploying new AI technologies, or is it case by case?
- Partially structured40.1%
- Structured process in place37.1%
- Case-by-case22.8%
On average, how long does it take to move an AI project from development to production?
- 3–6 months43.6%
- 1–3 months24.3%
- 6–12 months18.0%
- <1 month6.4%
- 12+ months5.5%
- Unsure / haven't made it there2.2%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Customer Experience & Engagement over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation53.1%
- Moderate Transformation36.6%
- Limited or No Transformation10.3%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Operations & Process Automation over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation59.4%
- Moderate Transformation31.8%
- Limited or No Transformation8.8%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Product Development & Innovation over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation46.9%
- Moderate Transformation39.3%
- Limited or No Transformation13.8%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Manufacturing & Engineering over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation56.8%
- Moderate Transformation26.3%
- Limited or No Transformation16.9%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Back Office functions (HR, Finance & Legal) over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation54.0%
- Moderate Transformation34.4%
- Limited or No Transformation11.6%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Coding & Development over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation57.2%
- Moderate Transformation34.2%
- Limited or No Transformation8.6%
How much AI-driven transformation do you expect in Sales & Marketing over the coming 3–5 years?
- Significant Transformation51.8%
- Moderate Transformation39.2%
- Limited or No Transformation9.0%
When do you plan to implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)?
- Within 6–12 months31.1%
- Within 6 months25.7%
- Already implemented21.9%
- Unsure / Evaluating21.3%
How important are vendor partnerships and ecosystem strength (e.g., cloud providers, specialized AI vendors, integrators) to the success of your AI strategy?
- Very Important — Critical to AI strategy54.2%
- Somewhat Important — Helpful but not essential34.9%
- Neutral / Moderate — Minor role9.2%
- Not Important1.7%
Which of the following best describes your organization's current position or status on Shadow AI?
- Strictly prohibited with enforcement issues37.3%
- Strictly prohibited and enforced22.8%
- Guided allowance / support22.8%
- Flexible / Experimental14.7%
- Unsure2.4%
How important is implementing strict monitoring and access controls in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?
- Very Important64.7%
- Somewhat Important30.3%
- Not Important5.0%
How important is providing training and guidelines for safe AI use in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?
- Very Important66.5%
- Somewhat Important26.1%
- Not Important7.4%
How important is conducting audits or reviews of AI tool usage in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?
- Very Important53.9%
- Somewhat Important37.5%
- Not Important8.6%
How important is accepting some risk as part of an innovation strategy in managing risks associated with Shadow AI?
- Very Important47.6%
- Somewhat Important40.1%
- Not Important12.3%
Primary Approach to Managing Shadow AI Risks
- Training & guidelines for safe AI use52.4%
- Strict monitoring & access controls22.8%
- Audits or reviews of AI tool usage18.8%
- Accepting some risk for innovation6.1%